Breaking News: Labour Party Appeals Kano Court Judgement

IMG 20230522 WA02141
Spread the love

BREAKING: Labour Party Appeals Kano Court Judgment

The Labour Party (LP) has lodged an appeal against the judgment of the Federal High Court in Kano, presided over by Justice M N Yunusa.

AttNews reports that the court had declared all votes cast for the LP candidates in Kano, Abia, and other parts of Nigeria as wasted votes.

The court’s ruling stemmed from a case, numbered FHC/KN/CS/107/2023, brought by Mr. Ibrahim Haruna Ibrahim against the Labour Party and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The court determined that the selection process leading to the emergence of Abia State Governor-elect, Alex Otti, and other LP candidates did not comply with the requirements stipulated in the 2022 electoral act.

One of the crucial points raised in the lawsuit was the LP’s failure to submit its membership register to INEC at least 30 days prior to their primaries, which the court deemed a violation, thereby invalidating the entire selection process.

The applicant further sought the court’s intervention to set aside the Certificate of Return issued to all LP candidates and direct INEC to declare the first runner-up as the winner in all constituencies where the LP emerged victorious.

Justice Yunusa pronounced, “A party that has not complied with the provisions of the electoral act cannot be considered to have a candidate in an election, and thus, cannot be declared the winner. Therefore, the votes attributed to the first defendant [Labour Party] are wasted votes.” However, the judge declined to order the issuance of a Certificate of Return to any individual in Abia state, stating that “the parties that participated in Abia state are not parties before this court.”

Responding to the ruling, LP’s legal counsel, Umeh Kalu SAN, filed an appeal on May 22, urging the court to set aside the judgment of the trial court.

Kalu outlined the grounds for the appeal, arguing that “the trial court erred in law and caused a miscarriage of justice by entertaining a suit that lacked any cause of action.”

He further contended that Section 285 of the 1999 Constitution confers exclusive jurisdiction on Election Tribunals to address complaints related to candidates’ participation and the votes garnered during a general election.


Spread the love
By Abia ThinkTank

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts